Main Article Content

Abstract

This article aims to explore the implementation of Village Government accountability in financial, administrative and policy aspects, by taking the object of research in Temuwuh Village, Dlingo District, Bantul Regency, DIY which is a representation of villages in the border region. The method used is a qualitative method with an exploratory approach, using depth interviews, FGD, observation and documentation in collecting . The results showed that the accountability of the performance of the Temuwuh Village Government had been running in accordance with applicable regulations, but it was not optimal. The community is still passive and has not been involved in the program and budget preparation process. The role of the community to be involved in the policy formulation process is also low, as well as the lack of administrative accountability due to the unavailability of SOPs and the support of adequate information systems.

Keywords

Accountability; Village Government; Performance;

Article Details

How to Cite
Suranto, S., Mutiarin, D., Darumurti, A., & Hartomi Akta Padma Eldo, D. (2020). Accountability for The Performance of Temuwuh Village Government, Dlingo Sub-District, Bantul District, Special Region Of Yogyakarta. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 4(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.4.2.2019.132-142

References

  1. Asian Development Bank. (1999). Governance : Sound Development Management. Jakarta: Asian Development Bank Press.
  2. Chhatre, A. (2008). Political Articulation and Accountability in Decentralisation: Theory and Evidence from India. Conservation and Society. Journal of Politic, 12-23.
  3. Creswell, J. (2012). Research design Pendekatan kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan. Mixed; Cetakan ke-2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  4. Darmadi, D., & Sudikin. (2009). Administrasi Publik. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo.
  5. Hakim, A. (2004). Akuntabilitas Kinerja Aparatur Pemerintah Desa dalam Pelayanan Publik di Desa Tandam Hulu II Kecamatan Hamparan Perak Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1-18.
  6. Irawati. (2010). Desentralisasi dan Demokrasi pada Tingkat Lokal Nagari sebagai Symbolic Democracy. Jurnal Visi Publik, 1-12.
  7. Komariah, A., & Satori, D. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  8. Krina, L. L. (2003). Indikator& Alat Ukur Prinsip Akuntabilitas, Transparansi & Partisipasi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Good Public Governance Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
  9. Peters, B. G. (2000). The Politics of Bureaucracy. London: Routledge.
  10. sadat, A. (2016). Efektivitas Kinerja Badan Penanggulanan Bencana Daerah dalam Pengurangan Resiko Bencana di Kota Baubau. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Politik Daerah, 1-20.
  11. Setyoko, P. (2011). Akuntabilitas Administrasi Keuangan Program Alokasi Dana Desa. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 14-24.
  12. Shafritz, J., & E.W. , R. (1997). Introducing Public Administration. USA: Longman.
  13. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif,. Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  14. Wida, Supatmoko, & Kurrohman, D. (2017). Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa (ADD) di Desa-Desa Kecamatan Rogojampi Kabupaten Banyuwangi. Jurnal Universitas Negeri Jember, 148-152.