Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 427 Download : 1088

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study intends to trace the relationship between administrative accountability and social accountability and its impact on the level of welfare of the people of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. For this purpose, case study research is carried out with a qualitative approach. This study uses data collection techniques such as desk study and interviews. Desk study is carried out through secondary data tracking, while the interviews were conducted with Bappeda and Internal Supervisory Board. The findings of the research show that a number of mechanisms prepared by the DIY Government in the framework of overseeing the implementation of development are not sufficient to contribute on improving the welfare of the community. This is because the existing mechanism is more administrative and not substantive (social). The mechanism prepared by the Government of the Special Region of Yogyakarta does not provide space for community participation. The space of participation provided is more formalistic. Consequently, the substantive accountability that provides a way for the operation of administrative and social accountability is not found.

Keywords

Social Accountability Administrative Accountability

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Faidati, N., & Khozin, M. (2020). The Relevance of Administrative Accountability and Social Accountability and its Impact on Welfare Improvement: DIY Province Case Study. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 5(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.5.1.2020.12-19

References

  1. Arsyad, L. (2014). Ekonomi Pembangunan. Pustaka Pelajar.
  2. Auditya, L., & Husaini, L. (2013). Analisis pengaruh akuntabilitas dan transparansi pengelolaan keuangan daerah terhadap kinerja pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Fairness, 3(1), 21-41.
  3. Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & HART, P. T. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public administration, 86(1), 225-242.
  4. Cendon, A. B. (2000). Accountability and public administration: concepts, dimensions, developments. Openness and transparency in governance: Challenges and opportunities, 22-61.
  5. Fung, A., & Kosack, S. (2014). Confrontation and collaboration. Blog No. 5. London: Transparency and Accountability Initiative.
  6. Grandvoinnet, H., Aslam, G., & Raha, S. (2015). Opening the black box: The contextual drivers of social accountability. World Bank Publications.
  7. Hartanti, K., & CHARIRI, A. (2011). Pandangan Publik Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Daerah di Provinsi Jawa Tengah (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Diponegoro).
  8. Joshi, A. (2017). Legal Empowerment and Social Accountability: Complementary Strategies Toward Rights-based Development in Health?. World Development, 99, 160-172.
  9. Joshi, A., & Abdikeeva, A. (2014). Social accountability and legal empowerment: Reaping the synergies. Draft paper, prepared for the Expert Meeting on Social Accountability and Legal: Allied Approaches in the Struggle for Health
  10. Kusumaningrum, I. (2009). Pengaruh kejelasan sasaran anggaran, pengendalian akuntansi dan sistem pelaporan terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah provinsi jawa tengah (Doctoral dissertation, Diponegoro University).
  11. Lodenstein, E., Dieleman, M., Gerretsen, B., & Broerse, J. E. (2013). A realist synthesis of the effect of social accountability interventions on health service providers’ and policymakers’ responsiveness. Systematic Reviews, 2(1), 98.
  12. Ramadhan, A. R. (2014). Implementasi Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Kebijakan Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Berdasarkan Good Governance (Studi di Dinas Pendapatan Kabupaten Banyuwangi). Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, 1(1).
  13. Rohmah, Y. A. (2018). ANALISIS AKUNTABILITAS PROGRAM KELUARGA HARAPAN (Studi Deskriptif Akuntabilitas Administratif Pelaksanaan Program Keluarga Harapan Bidang Pendidikan di Kecamatan Semampir Surabaya). Jurnal Aplikasi Administrasi, 18(1), 1-9.
  14. Rondonuwu, B. C., Lapian, M. T., & Kairupan, J. K. (2017). Akuntabilitas Kinerja Aparat Dalam Pelayanan Publik Di Kelurahan Sendangan Kecamatan Kawangkoan. Jurnal Eksekutif, 1(1).
  15. Salim, Agus. (2001). Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  16. Sirker, K., & Cosic, S. (2007). Empowering the Marginalized: Case Studies of Social Accountability Initiatives in Asia. World Bank Publications.
  17. Stake, R.E. (1978). The Case Study Method of Social Inquiry. Dalam Educational Researcher. No 7 (2), hal. 5-8.
  18. Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: AlfaBeta.
  19. Tao, S. O. N. G. (2005). On the Definition of Administrative Accountability [J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences), 2, 009.
  20. Wahyuningsih, R. D., & Hastjarjo, S. (2015). The Social Accountability Paradox in the Regional Democratic Budget Policy Making. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 21(3), 146-154.
  21. Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Fourth Edition). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  22. Yunika, A. (2014). Analisis Pelaksanaan Program Keluarga Berencana Dan Pemberdayaan Perempuan (Studi Kasus Di Kepunghuluan Bagan Jawa Kecamatan Bangko Kabupaten Rokan Hilir. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Riau Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau).

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'