Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 537 Download : 517

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the development trend of community satisfaction with the performance of the Gianyar Regency government, especially health services and social welfare services in the Covid-19 pandemic. This research is a survey research conducted to the Gianyar community regarding the Community Satisfaction Index on the performance of the Gianyar Regency government. This research uses measuring tools and indicators of the Regulation of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Number 14 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for the Survey of Community Satisfaction on Public Service Delivery. The results showed that the indicators of time and complaint handling showed a low trend compared to other elements. The time indicator shows a score of 3.015 and the complaint handling indicator shows a score of 3.04. In general, the Community Satisfaction Index on Government Performance is good with an average score of 78.29.

Keywords

Government Performance Public Service Covid-19 Pandemic

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ginting, R. T., Ras Amanda Gelgel, N. M., & Kadek Dwita Apriani. (2022). Public Service Performance in Gianyar during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Time and Handling of Complaints Needs Special Attention. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 7(1), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.7.1.2022.17-25

References

  1. Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2020). New development: COVID-19 as an accelerator of digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money and Management, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206
  2. Bourgon, J. (2008). The future of public service: A search for a new balance: Keynote address to the 2008 IPAA national conference, Sydney, NSW, June 2008.: KEY SPEECH. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(4), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00597.x
  3. Carreras, M., Vera, S., & Visconti, G. (2021). Does issue framing shape support for COVID-19 lockdown measures? Evidence from a survey experiment in Peru. Research and Politics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211051177
  4. Diehl, C., & Wolter, F. (2021). Attitudes about containment measures during the 2020/2021 coronavirus pandemic: self-interest, or broader political orientations? Research and Politics, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211035319
  5. Dwiyanto, A. (2014). MEWUJUDKAN GOOD GOVERNANCE MELALUI PELAYANAN PUBLIK.pdf (pp. 190–219).
  6. Eljawati, E., Tefa, G., Susilawati, S., Suwanda, S. N., & Suwanda, D. (2021). Leadership in the quality public service improvement. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 252–263. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6ns1.2027
  7. Hondeghem, A., & Vandenabeele, W. (2007). New Public Service. In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Second Edition (Print Version). https://doi.org/10.1201/noe1420052756.ch268
  8. Houston, D. J. (2000). Public-Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024288
  9. Indrayathi, P. A., Pradnyani, P. E., Saptiaryati, N. L., Putu, L., Ulandari, S., & Kolozsvari, L. R. (2022). PERCEIVED QUALITY OF CARE DURING COVID-19 AT SANJIWANI HOSPITAL GIANYAR, BALI. In OISAA Journal of Indonesia Emas OISAA JIE (Vol. 2022).
  10. Jin, Q., Raza, S. H., Yousaf, M., Zaman, U., & Siang, J. M. L. D. (2021). Can communication strategies combat covid-19 vaccine hesitancy with trade-off between public service messages and public skepticism? Experimental evidence from Pakistan. Vaccines, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9070757
  11. Kousser, T., Hill, S., Lockhart, M., Merolla, J. L., & Romero, M. (2021). How do Americans want elections to be run during the COVID-19 crisis? Research and Politics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211012228
  12. Lupiyoadi Rambat, H. A. (2006). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa. PT Salemba Empat.
  13. Mahsyar, A. (2011). Masalah Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik. Otoritas : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 1(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v1i2.22
  14. Osborne, S. P., & Strokosch, K. (2022). Participation: Add-on or core component of public service delivery? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12536
  15. Sakir, Habibullah, A., & Nurfaisal, D. M. (2019). Kualitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Pada Masyarakat Adat Terasing (Studi Kasus Pada Suku Tengger Desa Ranu Pane).
  16. Stecula, D. A., & Pickup, M. (2021). How populism and conservative media fuel conspiracy beliefs about COVID-19 and what it means for COVID-19 behaviors. Research and Politics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168021993979
  17. Wakhid, A. A. (2017). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik Di Indonesia. Jurnal TAPIs, 01(14), 53–59.
  18. White, K. (2012). New public management. The Sage Dictionary of Health and Society, 1992, 52–53. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446215159.n596