Main Article Content

Abstract

There are many government policies in overcoming pandemics, starting with social distancing, working from home for most state civil servants, eliminating worship activities, staying at home movements, and reducing economic activity outside the home. However, the spread of the virus continues to increase, and the policy continues with the Enactment of Restrictions on Community Activities (PPKM). Implementing the Garut district government's approach seeks to lower the level of PPKM by implementing rules that can prevent and break the chain of transmission of the COVID-19 outbreak. The concept of Regional Autonomy can answer the current problems of local government bureaucracy if its implementation is adjusted to economic, social, political, and cultural conditions. This research uses a type of qualitative research with an exploratory approach. The results showed that local-level government through regional autonomy has a significant role, especially in handling covid-19. The implementation of policies at the central level must be executed quickly and appropriately by local governments. Autonomy exerts a substantial influence on the change of governance at the regional level.

Keywords

Government Policies Autonomy Approach Pandemic Covid-19

Article Details

How to Cite
mulyaningsih, M. (2022). Regional Level Covid-19 Handling Policy with Autonomy Approach in Garut Regency. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 6(2), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.6.2.2021.65-73

References

  1. Agustino, L. (2020). Policy Analysis of Handling the Covid-19 Outbreak: Indonesia's Experience. Journal of Borneo Administrator, 16(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i2.685
  2. Arry. (2014). INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF THE VILLAGE GOVERNMENT. Journal of Democracy and Regional Autonomy, 72,91–96.
  3. Detik.com. (2021). Garut red zone is the largest contributor to covid-19. https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-barat/d-5285994/garut-zona-merah-ini-kecamatan-penyumbang-kasus-covid-19-terbanyak
  4. Habibullah, A. (2020). Covid-19 in Prefectural Governance (Ridho ALhamdi (ed.); 1st ed.). Blue Ocean.
  5. Habibullah, A., Mutiarin, D., & Sarofah, R. (2019). The Challenges of Smart City Implementation in Indonesia: Case Study of Sleman Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. JDGP University of Northern Malaysia, 15(1), 1–18.
  6. Joharudin, A., Septiadi, M. A., Maharani, S., Aisi, T. D., & Nurwahyuningsih, N. (2020). Panic Syndrom Covid-19: Emphasis on Policy Given. Journal of Perspective, 4(1), 44–53.
  7. Juaningsih, I. N., Consuello, Y., Tarmidhi, A., & NurIrfan, D. (2020). Optimization of Government Policies in handling Covid-19 to the People of Indonesia. SALAM: Syar-I Social and Cultural Journal, 7(6), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i6.15363
  8. Kurniawansyah. (2020). Strategic Policy Concept in Addressing Economic Externalities from Covid-19 in Vulnerable Communities in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 1 No. (2), 130–139. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/fvm939e.pdf
  9. Like, T. G. (2020). Usability Testing on the Covid19 Aid Distribution Recipient Determination System Using Prometheus Method. Proceedings of the Unimus NationalSeminar, 3,1002–1012.
  10. Mangkunegara. (2005). Corporate Human Resource Management. Pt. Teen.
  11. Mankiw N.G. (2017). Principles of Macroeconomics. Cengage Learning.
  12. Meliala. (2020). Towards Good Governance with Reinventing Government. Journal of Citizen Education, 2(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6938.1247a
  13. Mufida, A. (2020). Polemic of Social Assistance in Pandemic Covid 19. Bulletin of Law & Justice, 4(1), 159–166.
  14. Muhyiddin. (2020). Covid-19, New Normal, and Development Planning in Indonesia. Journal of Development Planning: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 4(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v4i2.118
  15. Mulyadi, M. (2020). Community Participation in Handling the Spread of Covid-19. Research Center of the Dpr Ri Expertise Agency, XII(8), 13–18.
  16. Osborne, D. and P. P. (2000). Cutting Bureaucracy: Five Strategies Toward Entrepreneurial Government. STUDENT LIBRARY.
  17. Rahmansyah et al. (2020). Mapping of Social Assistance Distribution Problems for COvid-19 Handling in Indonesia. Journal of State Taxes and finance, 2(1), 90–102.
  18. Sanjaya, N. (2020). Regional Budgeting Policy during the Covid-19 Pandemic (Case Study in The Regional Government of Banten Province). Journal of Administrative Sciences: Media Development of Administrative Sciences and Practices, 17(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v17i2.608
  19. Solahudin, D., Eif, D., Amin, S., Sumpena, D., & Hilman, F. A. (2020). Leadership Analysis in Indonesia in the Framework of Covid-19 Emergency Response. Indonesian leadership, 2,1–8.
  20. Stephen, R. (2012). Organizational behavior. Salemba Four.
  21. Telaumbanua, D. (2020). The urgency of The Establishment of Rules Related to Covid-19 Prevention in Indonesia. QALAMUNA: Journal of Education, Social, and Religion, 12(01), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v12i01.290
  22. Tuwu, D. (2020). Government Policy in Handling the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal Public, 3(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v3i2.12535
  23. William N Dunn. (2000). No TitleThe Public Policy Analysis (2nd ed.). Gadja Mada Press.
  24. Wirawan. (2009). Evaluation of Human Resource Performance. Four Salemba.
  25. Zulfa, H., & Annas, R. (2020). Responding to the Reason of State Policy in Dealing with the Covid 19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Economics and Public Policy, 7(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.24815/ekapi.v7i1.17370

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'