Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1056 Download : 1190

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The issue of eradicating corruption in Indonesia is again in the public spotlight, this time related to the dismissal of 75 KPK employees because they were declared not to have passed the National Insight Test in order to transition to status as a State Civil Apparatus. Responding to issue, the community participated in expressing their views. However, the process of delivering opinions by the public isn’t done conventionally but through social media Twitter. This is a manifestation of the development of the digital democracy era, so the researcher intends to analyze the dynamics of twitter users in addressing the issue of the dismissal of 75 KPK employees, as a new way of democracy. The research uses a qualitative descriptive method, through a SNA approach by analyzing public sentiment on various people's 'tweets' on Twitter. The SNA data in question was obtained through the Drone Emprit database during the observation period from May 09 to May 12, 2021. The results obtained in the study showed that Netizens are divided into two groups, namely those who say they are pro against 75 KPK employees with a narrative of defending the dismissed KPK employees, while some other netters choose to oppose by bringing a narrative that the decision to dismiss is the right thing. Furthermore, it was concluded from the interactions of users of Twitter, the majority of netizens with various views expressed tended to support (Pro) 75 KPK employees who were dismissed. deliberately carried out by irresponsible with the mission of weakening the KPK.

Keywords

National Insight Test Corruption Drone Emprit KPK

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Wiebi Winarto, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

I am a student majoring in Government Science at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang, currently I am studying in semester 7. I am a person who is interested in contemporary issues of politics, democracy, law, public policy and so on. I am also a person who is interested in writing, several times I have done scientific writing as a form of implementation of the knowledge that I get in class.

How to Cite
Winarto, W., & Taqwa Sihidia, I. (2022). The Controversy of National Insight Test at KPK: A Sentiment Analysis on Twitter. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 7(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.7.1.2022.1-16

References

  1. Adang, Y. A. (2010). Kriminologi. Bandung:Refika
  2. Akbar, Geusan G Kurniadi, Dede Nurliawati, N. (2021). Content Analysis of Social Media: Public and Government Response to COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 25(1).
  3. Andriani, V. W. (2019). Meme Politik Setya Novanto Sebagai Representasi Demokrasi Digital Di Indonesia: Analisis Wacana Kritis. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 3(2), 231[Crossef]
  4. Anggelia, Sita & Syaifudin, A. (2021). Sentimen Warganet Mahasiswa Terhadap Covid-19. L I T E R A S I, 5
  5. Annur, M. C. (2020). Berapa Usia Mayoritas Pengguna Media Sosial di Indonesia? Katadata.Co.Id
  6. Barisione, M., Michailidou, A., & Airoldi, M. (2019). Understanding a digital movement of opinion: the case of #RefugeesWelcome. Information Communication and Society, 22(8)[Crossref]
  7. Barone, A. (2009). “Camgirls: Celebrity and community in the age of social networks,” by Theresa M. Senft. Transformative Works and Cultures, 3 [Crossref]
  8. Basuki, Z. M., Putra Hidayat, R. J., Asih, P. S., & Sihidi, I. T. (2021). Analisis Kebijakan Impor Beras 1 Juta Ton Oleh Pemerintah Indonesia: Data Dan Analisis Media Sosial. Jurnal Academia Praja, 4(2), 474–495 [Crossref]
  9. Cahyono, A. S. (2016). Pengaruh media sosial terhadap perubahan sosial masyarakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Ilmu Politik Diterbitkan Oleh Fakultas Ilmu Sosial & Politik, Universitas Tulungagung, 9(1).
  10. Damanik, E. L. (2018). Whatsapp Dan Pemilih Pemula Di Kota Medan : The Journal of Society & Media, 2(2), 81–108.
  11. de Albuquerque, J. P., Herfort, B., Brenning, A., & Zipf, A. (2015). A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(4) [Crossref]
  12. Evelina, L. W., & Handayani, F. (2018). Penggunaan Digital Influencer dalam Promosi Produk (Studi Kasus Akun Instagram @bylizzieparra). Warta ISKI, 1(01) [Crossref]
  13. Fatmawati, E. (2020). Kebebasan Informasi Kalangan Milenial Dalam Ber-media Sosial. JPUA: Jurnal Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga: Media Informasi Dan Komunikasi Kepustakawanan, 10(2) [Crossref]
  14. Felicia, F., & Loisa, R. (2019). Peran Buzzer Politik dalam Aktivitas Kampanye di Media Sosial Twitter. Koneksi, 2(2), 352 [Crossref]
  15. Gorodnichenko, Y., Pham, T., & Talavera, O. (2021). Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #Brexit and #USElection. European Economic Review, 136, 103772 [Crossref]
  16. Hasfi, N., Usmand, S., & Santoso, H. P. (2017). Anonimitas di Media Sosial: Sarana Kebebasan Berekspresi atau Patologi Demokrasi? Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(1), 28 [Crossref]
  17. Herlina, L. (2018). Disintegrasi Sosial Dalam Konten Media Sosial Facebook. TEMALI : Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 1(2), 232–258 [Crossref]
  18. ICW. (2021). Siaran Pers Indonesia Corruption Watch Polemik Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan: Dewan Pengawas Harus Memeriksa, Menyidangkan, dan Menjatuhkan Hukuman Berat kepada Ketua KPK!
  19. Kelly, S., Truong, M., Shahbaz, A., & Earp, M. (2016). Freedom on the Net 2016: Silencing the messenger - Communication apps under pressure. Freedom House, 44.
  20. KPK. (2021). Pengumuman Hasil Asesmen Tes Wawasan Kebangsaan Pegawai KPK. KPK.
  21. Lia, N. A. (2021). Demokrasi Virtual Dan Hasrat Dalam Menyampaikan Ujaran Kebencian Di Media Sosial Instagram. An-Nida: Jurnal Komunikasi Islam, 13(1).
  22. Loilatu, M. J., Irawan, B., Salahudin, S., & Sihidi, I. T. (2021). Analysis of Twitter’s Function as a Media communication of Public Transportation. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(1), 54 [Crossref]
  23. MK RI. (2019). PUTUSAN Nomor 70/PUU-XVII/2019.
  24. Nawatmi, S. (2014). Korupsi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi negara-negara Asia Pasifik. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi (JEB), 21(1).
  25. Rahman, A. (2021). 75 Pegawai Kpk Dinonaktifkan Setelah Tidak Lulus Test Wawasan Kebangsaan. Droneemprit.Id.
  26. Ramadhana, K., & Oktaryal, A. (2020). Laporan Penelitian Proyeksi Masa Depan Pemberantasan Korupsi Menelisik Pengesahan Revisi Undang-Undang Kpk. Icw.
  27. Rizaty, A. M. (2021). Siapa Tokoh Terpopuler di Twitter pada 2021? Katadata.Co.Id.
  28. Rosana, C. F. (2021). Ini Pasal-Pasal UU KPK Baru yang Berpotensi Hambat Pemberantasan Korupsi. Tempo.Com.
  29. Salahudin, S. et al. (2020). Analysis of Government Official Twitters during Covid-19 Crisis in Indonesia Analysis of Government Official Twitters during Covid-19 Crisis in Indonesia. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(June), 3899–3915.
  30. Sihidi, I. T., Romadhan, A. A., & Fitrah, D. (2022). Journal of Political Issues Vaksin dan Sentimen Publik : Sebuah Analisis. Journal of Political Issues, 3(2), 107–114.
  31. Silitonga, M. S., Anthonio, G., Heyse, L., & Wittek, R. (2015). Institutional change and corruption of public leaders: A social capital perspective on Indonesia. In Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia [Crossref]
  32. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Metode Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan R&D.
  33. Tempo.com. (2021). Novel Baswedan dan Kasus-Kasus Besar Korupsi Yang Diungkapnya. Tempo.Com.
  34. Tsagarousianou, R. (1999). Electronic Democracy «/ ι Rhetoric amd Reality. 24, 189–208.
  35. UNCAC. (2003). United Nations Convention Against Corruption, 2003.
  36. Vrushi, J., & Roberto Martinez B. Kukutschka. (2021). Why fighting corruption matters in times of COVID-19. Transparency International, January.
  37. Watkins, Alan & Stratenus, I. (2016). Crowdocracy: The End of Politics. Urbane Publications.
  38. Werenfridus, M., Sihidi, I. T., & Hadi, K. (2021). Map Analysis of The Pro-Con Arguments Against Permendikbud 30 Of Sexual Violence. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 11(2), 328–347.
  39. Wicaksono, B. S. (2021). Parodi Politik dalam Demokrasi Digital Studi Kasus: Akun Instagram Nurhadi-Aldo. Perspektif, 10(1), 36–46 [Crossref]
  40. World Bank. (1997). Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The role of the World Bank. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management, September.