Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 292 Download : 509

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) arrange the form of measurement instrument of internalization and practice of Pancasila that refers to MPR Decree No. 1 of 2003, (2) test the construct validity of instrument items of measurement of Pancasila internalization and practice based on Rasch modeling. Design development instruments using procedural models ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The validity test of the construct includes the content, substantive, structural and external aspects based on Rasch modeling.. The test consisted of 45 statements and respondents were asked to give an agreement on all statements. Scoring of test testees' responses can be done well with Rasch modeling. The instrument of internalization and practice of Pancasila has fulfilled the construct validity seen from the content, substantive, structural and external aspects. It conclude that the form of tests used can be widely applied and can be presented using information technology.

Keywords

Measurement internalization practice Pancasila Rasch

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Susongko, P., Bandari, R., & Sugiharti, U. (2022). Internalization Policy for the Practice of Pancasila in Society. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 6(2), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.6.2.2021.74-90

References

  1. Adi, P. 2016. Pembudayaan Nilai-nilai Pancasila bagi Masyarakat sebagai Modal Dasar Pertahanan Nasional NKRI. Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan, 1(1), 37-50.
  2. Amir, S. 2013. Pancasila as Integration Philosophy of Education and National Character. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2( 1), 54-57.
  3. Asrori, A. 2015. Radikalisme di Indonesia: Antara Historisitas dan Antropisitas. Kalam, 9(2), 253-268.
  4. Ayele, Dawit G; Zewotir, Temesgen; Mwambi, Henry. 2014. Using Rasch Modeling to Re-Evaluate Rapid Malaria Diagnosis Test Analyses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11. (7 ) 6681-91.
  5. Berry, W. D., Fording, R. C., Ringquist, E. J., Hanson, R. L., & Klarner, C. E. (2010). Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the US States: A Re-appraisal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(2), 117-135.
  6. Berry, W. D., Fording, R. C., Ringquist, E. J., Hanson, R. L., & Klarner, C. (2013). A new measure of state government ideology, and evidence that both the new measure and an old measure are valid. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 13(2), 164-182.
  7. Bo’a, F. Y. 2018. Pancasila sebagai Sumber Hukum dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(1), 21-49.
  8. Deksino, G. R. 2018. Membangun Ketahanan Nasional yang Berkelanjutan dalam Konteks Kemajemukan Bangsa Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Paper: Revitalisasi Indonesia melalui Identitas Kemajemukan Berdasarkan Pancasila. UKI Press, Pusat Studi Lintas Agama dan Budaya UKI Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat . ISBN : 978 979 8148 96 5
  9. Dwilaraswati, A., & Warsono, W. 2014. Tingkat pemahaman siswa kelas viii smp negeri 5 kota mojokerto tentang empat pilar kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Kajian Moral dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(2).
  10. Elhan, A. H., Küçükdeveci, A. A., & Tennant, A. L. A. N. 2010). The Rasch Measurement Model. Research Issues in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 89-102.
  11. Fanani, A. F. 2013. Fenomena Radikalisme di Kalangan Kaum Muda. MAARIF, 8(1), 4-13.
  12. Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. 1999. Applying Educational Research: A Practical Guide. Longman Publishing Group.
  13. HoHensinn, C., & Kubinger, K. D. 2011. On the impact of missing values on item fit and the model validness of the Rasch model. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(3), 380.
  14. Indonesia Conference on Religion and Peace ICRP. 2011. Aksi Kekerasan dan Diskriminasi di Indonesia.
  15. Isabella, I. 2019. Sosialisasi Wawasan Kebangsaan sebagai Upaya Penguatan Ketahanan Nasional Indonesia. Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik, 3(1).
  16. Kusumohamidjojo, B. (2016). Ketertiban yang Adil Versus Ketidakadilan: Beban Sosial-Ekonomi yang Historis dari Hukum. Veritas et Justitia, 2(1), 1-36.
  17. Lamprianou, I. 2010. The practical application of optimal appropriateness measurement on empirical data using Rasch Models. Journal of applied measurement, 11(4), 409.
  18. Lembaga Kajian Islam dan Perdamaian (LaKIP), Oktober 2010-Januari 2011, Survei Perilaku Keagamaan Kaum Muda Indonesia.
  19. Liu, M. T., & Yu, P. T. 2011. Aberrant learning achievement detection based on person-fit statistics Fin personalized e-learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(1), 107-120.
  20. Lu, Yen-Mou, et al. 2013. Measurement precision of the disability for back pain scale-by applying Rasch analysis.Journal of Health and Quality of Life Outcomes ,11, Page 119 http://search.proquest.com/docview/1412368063?accountid=62691.
  21. Magis, D., Raîche, G., & Béland, S.2012. A didactic presentation of Snijders’s lz* index of person fit with emphasis on response model selection and ability estimation. Journal of Educational and Behavioral statistics, 37(1), 57-81.
  22. MagnisSuseno, F. 2011. “Nilai-nilai Pancasila sebagai Orientasi Pembudayaan Kehidupan Berkonstitusi ” dalam Implementasi Nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam Menegakkan Konstitusionalitas Indonesia, Kerjasama Mahkamah Konstitusi RI dengan Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 2--3 Mei 2013.
  23. Meyer, J. P., & Zhu, S. 2013. Fair and equitable measurement of student learning in MOOCs: An introduction to item response theory, scale linking, and score equating. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8, 26-39.
  24. Mok, M. and Wright, B. 2004. Overview of Rasch Model Families. Introduction to Rasch Measurement: Theory, Models and Applications (hal 1-24). Minnesota: Jam Press.
  25. Molenda, M. 2003. In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance improvement, 42(5), 34-37.
  26. Mudzakkir, A. 2017. Konservatisme Islam dan Intoleransi Keagamaan di Tasikmalaya. Harmoni, 16(1), 57-74.
  27. Mukhtar, S. 2017. Keamanan Nasional: Antara Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia. Sociae Polites, 1(1), 127-137.
  28. Munip, A. 2012. Menangkal radikalisme agama di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 159-181.
  29. Purnomo, P. 2017. Pengembangan buletin kampus bermuatan nilai kebhinekaan Pancasila untuk menangkal radikalisme pada mahasiswa STKIP Darussalam Cilacap. Lingua, 13(2), 143-150.
  30. Qodir, Z. 2016.Kaum Muda, Intoleransi, dan Radikalisme Agama. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 5(1), 429-445.
  31. Saputro. 2009. Laporan Kehidupan Keagamaan di Indonesia. Centre for Religious and Cultural Studies UGM.
  32. Setara Institute .2019.Pelanggaran Kebebasan Beragama Terbanyak di Jawa Barat https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/setara-institute-pelanggaran-kebebasan-beragama-terbanyak-di-jawa-barat/5162242.html
  33. Shu, Z., Henson, R., & Luecht, R. 2013. Using deterministic, gated item response theory model to detect test cheating due to item compromise. Psychometrika, 78(3), 481-497.
  34. Sjamsuar, Z. B. 2009. Grand Teori Politik Negarawan. Jurnal Varia Bina Civika, 75 (1), 1-14.
  35. Smith, A. B., Fallowfield, L. J., Stark, D. P., Velikova, G., & Jenkins, V.2010.A Rasch and confirmatory factor analysis of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12. Health and quality of life outcomes, 8(1), 45.
  36. Sugiyono 2010. Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  37. Sukmana, Y.2018. "Survei LSI: DPR, Lembaga Negara dengan Tingkat Kepercayaan Terendah", https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/07/31/17242921/survei-lsi-dpr-lembaga-negara-dengan-tingkat-kepercayaan terendah?page=all.
  38. Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. 2014. Aplikasi model Rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial (edisi revisi). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
  39. Susongko, P. 2016. Validation of science achievement test with the rasch model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 268-277.
  40. Tempo, 27 April 2011. Sekolah Diminta Aktif Bendung Paham Radikal. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/330309/sekolah-diminta-aktif-bendung-paham-radikal/full&view=ok
  41. The Wahid Institute. 2012. Laporan Kehidupan Keagamaan di Indonesia.
  42. The Wahid Institute. 2014. Kekerasan Bernuansa Keagamaan di Indonesia.
  43. Thomas Santosa. 2012. Radikalisme dan Kekerasan Agama, Galia Indonesia, Jakarta.
  44. Wahyudi, A. 2006. Ideologi Pancasila: Doktrin yang Komprehensif atau Konsepsi Politis?Jurnal Filsafat, 16(1), 94-115.
  45. Wu, M., & Adams, R. 2007. Applying the Rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne: Educational Measurement Solutions.
  46. Yayasan Denny JA dan LSI Community. 2012. Laporan Kehidupan Keagamaan Indonesia.
  47. Zainal Abidin Bagir, Suhadi dan Endy.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'