Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 100 Download : 51

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the framework related to the Government Policy of determining the Average weightage against each citizen of the country, which will decide the value or impact of the Individual Vote given to the Candidate by the Voter in the Election process and similarly that Average Weightage will be deciding the Election Candidate validity to run in the Election. Researchers are doing research work in this specific use case using ‘Qualitative Research.’ This research data was taken from social media, Online Media, Websites, Journals, and Articles and then represented in descriptive format. This study indicates that the creation of this Policy will surely improve the quality of the Election process in the country and build more trust in the Citizens in the Electoral Process. There are several milestones that need to be fulfilled for the development and successful implementation of this policy—first, the analysis and determining the critical indicators required for the Average Weightage calculation. Second, the selection of the medium for the solution. Finally, then start the development of the solution based on the analysis. This paper is limited to the extent to which the problem is clearly described, then proposing the solution and how it should work, and lastly, what benefits the solution will be given to resolve the challenge the current Election process is facing.

Keywords

Democracy Citizen Index Score E-government Voters Candidates

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Younus, M., Purwaningsih, T., Eka Rahmawati, D., Suswanta, Nurmandi, A., & Gul, H. (2024). E-Government Policy to give their Citizens a ‘Citizen Index Score’ based on which Citizens can Take Part as Voters in the Election. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 8(2), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.8.2.2023.137-160

References

  1. Bermudez, A. (2022). Plural violence(s) and migrants’ transnational engagement with democratic politics: the case of Colombians in Europe. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00298-w
  2. Bjørnskov, C., & Rode, M. (2022). Late colonial antecedents of modern democracy. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(4), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137421000734
  3. Bolin, N., Dahlberg, S., & Blombäck, S. (2023). The stigmatisation effect of the radical right on voters’ assessment of political proposals. West European Politics, 46(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.2019977
  4. Britzman, K. J., & Kantack, B. R. (2022). Do Ideological Attacks Change How Voters Evaluate Primary Election Candidates? American Politics Research, 50(5), 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221112392
  5. Cantarella, M., Fraccaroli, N., & Volpe, R. (2023). Does fake news affect voting behaviour? Research Policy, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104628
  6. Correa, A. L., Ames, M. C. F. D. C., & Zappellini, M. B. (2022). Nudge Policies in COVID-19 Context: A Necessary Action or Ethical Dilemma? Revista de Administracao Contemporanea, 26(5 Special issue). https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022210033.en
  7. Esaku, S. (2022). Institutionalized democracy and the shadow economy in the short- and long-run: empirical analysis from Uganda. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01128-1
  8. Finkelman, P. (2022). Voting Rights, Democracy, and the Constitution After January 6,2021. Louisiana Law Review, 82(2), 483–517. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134314371&partnerID=40&md5=4b8ed0448cdde9591d9192e25297902a
  9. Frank Herbert. (1987). Frank Herbert quote. A-Z Quotes. https://www.azquotes.com/quote/1358466
  10. Frank Herbert. (n.d.). A quote from children of dune. Goodreads | Meet your next favorite book. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/95127-governments-if-they-endure-always-tend-increasingly-toward-aristocratic-forms
  11. Giraudet, L.-G., Apouey, B., Arab, H., Baeckelandt, S., Bégout, P., Berghmans, N., Blanc, N., Boulin, J.-Y., Buge, E., Courant, D., Dahan, A., Fabre, A., Fourniau, J.-M., Gaborit, M., Granchamp, L., Guillemot, H., Jeanpierre, L., Landemore, H., Laslier, J.-F., … Tournus, S. (2022). Correction: “Co-construction” in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate (Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, (2022), 9, 1, (207), 10.1057/s41599-022-01212-6). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01390-3
  12. Google data studio overview. (n.d.). Google Data Studio Overview. https://datastudio.google.com/u/0/
  13. Griffith, B. N. K. (2020). Rethinking democracy in twenty-first century Europe: The role of ancient democracy. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta, Filosofiia i Konfliktologiia, 36(4), 700–708. https://doi.org/10.21638/SPBU17.2020.408
  14. Gutiérrez, M., Simmons, A. J., & Transue, J. (2022). Ranked-Choice Voting and Democratic Attitudes. American Politics Research, 50(6), 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221109519
  15. Hendricks, S. (2017, October 7). Why Socrates hated democracy, and what we can do about it. Big Think. https://bigthink.com/politics-current-affairs/why-socrates-hated-democracy-and-what-we-can-do-about-it/
  16. Holbein, J. B., Bradshaw, C. P., Munis, B. K., Rabinowitz, J., & Ialongo, N. S. (2022). Promoting Voter Turnout: An Unanticipated Impact of Early-Childhood Preventive Interventions. Prevention Science, 23(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01275-y
  17. Hortal, A. (2022). Nudges: a promising behavioral public policy tool to reduce vaccine hesitancy. Revista Brasileira de Politicas Publicas, 12(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.5102/RBPP.V12I1.7993
  18. Hsu, S.-W. (2022). At the critical moment: The rhizomatic organization and “Democracy to Come.” Scandinavian Journal of Management, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101232
  19. Joachim, S., Forkan, A. R. M., Jayaraman, P. P., Morshed, A., & Wickramasinghe, N. (2022). A Nudge-Inspired AI-Driven Health Platform for Self-Management of Diabetes. Sensors, 22(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124620
  20. Kabwama, S. N., Kiwanuka, S. N., Mapatano, M. A., Fawole, O. I., Seck, I., Namale, A., Ndejjo, R., Kizito, S., Monje, F., Bosonkie, M., Egbende, L., Bello, S., Bamgboye, E. A., Dairo, M. D., Adebowale, A. S., Salawu, M. M., Afolabi, R. F., Diallo, I., Leye, M. M. M., … Wanyenze, R. K. (2022). Private sector engagement in the COVID-19 response: experiences and lessons from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda. Globalization and Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00853-1
  21. Kammerer Jr., E. F., & Michelson, M. R. (2022). You Better Vote: Drag Performers and Voter Mobilization in the 2020 Election. PS - Political Science and Politics, 55(4), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000713
  22. Keenan, L., & McElroy, G. (2022). Who wants women to run? an investigation of gender differences in patterns of support among Irish local election candidates. Irish Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2022.2078033
  23. Langsæther, P. E., Goubin, S., & Haugsgjerd, A. (2022). Subverted expectations and social democratic austerity: How voters’ reactions to policies are conditional on the policy-implementing actor. Electoral Studies, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102529
  24. Lederman, S. (2022). Representative Democracy and Colonial Inspirations: The Case of John Stuart Mill. American Political Science Review, 116(3), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001283
  25. Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Ye, M. (2022). Public participation in democracy, local accountability and happiness: Evidence from rural China. Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12738
  26. Long, M. T., Dawe, R., & Suhay, E. (2022). Gender Attitudes and Candidate Preferences in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary and General Elections. Politics and Gender, 18(3), 830–857. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000155
  27. Lundstedt, M., & Edgell, A. B. (2022). Electoral management and vote-buying. Electoral Studies, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102521
  28. Microsoft Power BI (n.d.). https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/desktop/
  29. Nonnemacher, J. (2023). Representational deprivation: niche parties, niche voters and political protest. West European Politics, 46(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2040237
  30. Nudge theory. (2022, October 2). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudge_theory
  31. Nyblade, B., Wellman, E. I., & Allen, N. (2022). Transnational voting rights and policies in violent democracies: a global comparison. Comparative Migration Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00299-9
  32. Partheymüller, J., Müller, W. C., Rabitsch, A., Lidauer, M., & Grohma, P. (2022). Participation in the administration of elections and perceptions of electoral integrity. Electoral Studies, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102474
  33. Pasek, M. H., Ankori-Karlinsky, L.-O., Levy-Vene, A., & Moore-Berg, S. L. (2022). Misperceptions about out-partisans’ democratic values may erode democracy. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19616-4
  34. Pestaña, J. L. M. (2018). Introduction to the monograph Receptions of ancient democracy. Athens: Round-trip travel. Logos (Spain), 51, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.5209/ASEM.61640
  35. Pildes, R. H. (2020). PARTICIPATION AND POLARIZATION. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 22(2), 341–408. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85110647982&partnerID=40&md5=6edc0d5bb6fab6724e72484ccfc65106
  36. Plescia, C., & Zucchini, F. (2023). Government alternation and proximity voting: how policy change opportunities shape electoral behaviour. West European Politics, 46(1), 148–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1994843
  37. Schechter, L., & Vasudevan, S. (2023). Persuading voters to punish corrupt vote-buying candidates: Experimental evidence from a large-scale radio campaign in India. Journal of Development Economics, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102976
  38. Siddharth Sharma. (2016, November). OSF. https://osf.io/w9zug/download
  39. Sokolon, M. K. (2019). It’s All in the Argument: Euripides’ Agōnes and Deliberative Democracy. European Legacy, 24(7–8), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2019.1646544

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'