Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 28 Download : 10

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research analyzes whether expansion is a solution based on a competitive perspective, with a focus on the Nagari expansion in West Pasaman Regency. We collected data for this research using a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews with key informants from the Nagari government and local communities. The findings indicate that a nagari's expansion does not necessarily lead to its advancement. Many new nagari have not been optimal in managing resources, and there are ownership conflicts and competition between the parent region and newly emerging nagari, as well as the political transition process, which is hampering sustainable development. Therefore, while regional expansion offers new opportunities, the obstacles encountered underscore the necessity of assessing and enhancing policies to ensure the community's sustainable benefits and the attainment of Nagari autonomy.

Keywords

New Autonomous Regions Welfare State Public Policy Good Government

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mubai, N. N., Sri Kartini, D., & Sagita, N. I. (2024). The Creation of new autnonomous regions: Is this a solution for regional welfare ?. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 9(2), 118-127. https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.9.2.2024.118-127

References

  1. Anshari, K. (2018). Indonesia’s village fiscal transfers (dana desa) policy: the effect on local authority and resident participation. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 619–653.
  2. Bachiochi, P. D., & Weiner, S. P. (2004). Qualitative data collection and analysis. Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology, 161–183.
  3. Enikolopov, R., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2007). Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of public economics, 91(11–12), 2261–2290.
  4. Faggian, A., Modrego, F., & McCann, P. (2019). Human capital and regional development. Handbook of regional growth and development theories, 149–171.
  5. Faguet, J.-P. (2004). Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs?: Evidence from Bolivia. Journal of public economics, 88(3–4), 867–893.
  6. Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. Journal of public economics, 83(3), 325–345.
  7. Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732.
  8. Gustafsson, M.-T., & Scurrah, M. (2019). Strengthening subnational institutions for sustainable development in resource-rich states: Decentralized land-use planning in Peru. World Development, 119, 133–144.
  9. Ilmam, M. A. Z., Fajri, L. M. N., Hamdi, H., & Syamsurriadi, M. (2023). DAMPAK KEBIJAKAN PEMEKARAN WILAYAH. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika ISSN 2721-4796 (online), 4(3), 1247–1253.
  10. Jember, P. (2024). IDM Berstatus Berkembang, Menuju Desa yang Maju dan Mandiri. Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Jember. https://dpmd.jemberkab.go.id/bidang-pemerintahan-desa/26/idm-berstatus-berkembang-menuju-desa-yang-maju-dan-mandiri
  11. Jia, M., Liu, Y., Lieske, S. N., & Chen, T. (2020). Public policy change and its impact on urban expansion: An evaluation of 265 cities in China. Land Use Policy, 97, 104754.
  12. Kasman. (2023). Wawancara dengan Ketua Bamus Nagari Muaro Kiawai Barat.
  13. Katiman, K. (2021). Village governance and deliberative democracy: Examining empowered deliberative forums in rural villages, Indonesia. The Australian National University (Australia).
  14. Lopez, V., & Whitehead, D. (2013). Sampling data and data collection in qualitative research. Nursing & midwifery research: Methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice, 123, 140.
  15. Marwin. (2023). Wawancara dengan Pj. Walinagari Ranah Koto Tinggi.
  16. Nikijuluw, R. (2021). Essays on decentralisation and accountability in Indonesia. The Australian National University (Australia).
  17. Perdana, B., Efendi, A., & Khonif, A. (2023). Politik Hukum Terhadap Kekosongan Kepala Desa Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Desa. Birokrasi: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM DAN TATA NEGARA, 1(4), 342–349.
  18. Putra, S. (2023). Wawancara dengan Sekretaris Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Nagari Kabupaten Pasaman Barat.
  19. Santoso, L. (2012). Problematika Pemekaran Daerah Pasca Reformasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Supremasi Hukum, 1(2), 267–286.
  20. Sinuff, T., Cook, D. J., & Giacomini, M. (2007). How qualitative research can contribute to research in the intensive care unit. Journal of critical care, 22(2), 104–111.
  21. Smith, B. C. (2023). Decentralization: The territorial dimension of the state. Taylor & Francis.
  22. Smoke, P. J. (2001). Fiscal decentralization in developing countries: A review of current concepts and practice. Citeseer.
  23. Sopaheluwakan, W. R. I., Fatem, S. M., Kutanegara, P. M., & Maryudi, A. (2023). Two-decade decentralization and recognition of customary forest rights: Cases from special autonomy policy in West Papua, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 151, 102951.
  24. Syahrin, A. (2024). Wawancara dengan Tokoh Masyarakat Dalam Pemekaran Pasaman Barat.
  25. van Vliet, J. (2019). Direct and indirect loss of natural area from urban expansion. Nature Sustainability, 2(8), 755–763.
  26. Wang, Q., Xu, W., Huang, Y., & Yang, J. (2022). The effect of fast Internet on employment: Evidence from a Large Broadband Expansion Program in China. China & World Economy, 30(3), 100–134.
  27. Yuskar, Y., Bahari, A., Putra, E. G. E., Rahmadoni, J., & Mazelfi, I. (2024). Analysis of the Nagari readiness in implementing the smart village in West Sumatera, Indonesia. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 20(4), 422–441.