Government Regulations and Gender Justice: Feminist Criticism and Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah on Polygamy Permits
Main Article Content
Abstract
The government supports discrimination against feminism based on Jakarta Governor Regulation No. 2 of 2025, which regulates the procedure for granting polygamy permits to civil servants (PNS), has caused controversy because it is considered unfair to women. This study aims to critically analyze discrimination against women in regulations through a critical feminist and gender justice ethics approach. The results show that procedures such as the first wife's consent are symbolic and do not reflect a balanced power relationship, while the religious justification used ignores the principle of justice in maqashid al-shariah. It is concluded that the Governor Regulation risks perpetuating male dominance in the state structure and weakening the position of women as legal subjects. This study contributes to public policy and gender studies by placing the governor's regulation as empirical evidence rather than the main analytical source, showing that gender inequality in bureaucratic policy is rooted in structural and ideological governance frameworks. These findings offer an analytical contribution that can be applied to assess gender justice in state regulations beyond the specific case analyzed. Therefore, this study recommends that such policies be evaluated through a more participatory and gender-justice-based approach, and encourages the formulation of public regulations that prioritize the protection and equality of women's rights in the bureaucracy.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Aini, S., & Abdurrahman, A. (2021). RASIONALITAS PERINTAH AYAT POLIGAMI. Journal Al Irfani: Ilmu Al Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 2(2), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.51700/irfani.v2i2.313
Airiza, A., Syafa, R., Kara, A., & Santalia, I. (2024). Konsep Poligami menurut Pandangan Perempuan PNS di Kota Makassar terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah No . 45 Tahun 1990 Pasal 4 Ayat ( 2 ) Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syari ’ ah. 5(45), 175–202.
Alfian, M. (2018). Hermeneutika Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd. Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 18(01), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.32939/islamika.v18i1.268
Andressa Muthi’ Latansa. (2023). Poligami dalam Al Qur’an Surat An-Nisa’ Ayat 3 Perspektif Kitab Tafsir Al-Azhar Karya HAMKA. El-Faqih : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam, 9(2), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.58401/faqih.v9i2.1235
Andrian, T., Sulaeman, P., & Agata, Y. D. (2021). Sustainable Development Goal Disclosures in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunities. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(3), 604–617. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.800526
Anggi Tondi Martaon. (2025, January 17). Pergub Jakarta Izinkan Poligami Bentuk Diskriminasi Terhadap Perempuan. Metrotvnews.Com. https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/bzGCRvWP-pergub-jakarta-izinkan-poligami-bentuk-diskriminasi-terhadap-perempuan
ANWAR, S, H., HALIMATULM, ADAWIYAH, N., & DISNA, A, N. (2022). SOSIALISASI KONSEP KEADILAN DALAM PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI MENURUT ISLAM. Amaliah: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(2), 395–401.
Arbie, A., & Milhan, M. (2023). Analisis Terhadap Pengabulan Izin Poligami dengan Alasan Telah Menghamili Calon Istri Kedua (Telaah Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt. G/2019/PA. Rtg). UNES Law Review, 6(1), 3443–3451. https://www.review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/view/1138%0Ahttps://www.review-unes.com/index.php/law/article/download/1138/884
Arivia, G. (2006). Feminisme: sebuah kata hati. In Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Arivia, G. (2018). Filsafat berperspektif feminis. In Yayasan Jurnal Perempuan. YJP Press.
Arivia, G., & Subono, N. I. (2017). A Hundred Years of Feminism in Indonesia An Analysis of Actors, Debates and Strategies. Country Study, 1–28. www.fes-asia.org
Balogh, L., & Drinóczi, T. (2022). The missing arc of a backlash? Thirty years of constitutional debate on ‘women’s equality’ in Hungary. Intersections East European Journal of Society and Politics, 8(4), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.17356/IEEJSP.V8I4.969
Blalock, E. C., & Lyu, X. (2023). The patriot-preneur–China’s strategic narrative of women entrepreneurs in Chinese media. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 35(3–4), 264–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2165170
Boris, E., & Eifert, C. (2010). Gender: Equality and Differences. In The United States and Germany during the Twentieth Century: Competition and Convergence (pp. 161–179). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511762505.010
Curtin, J., & Devere, H. (2006). Global rankings and domestic realities: Women, work and policy in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140600672436
Fadhilah, N. (2013). Keadilan: Dari Plato Hingga Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Cita Hukum2, 5(1).
Gribble, K. D., Callaway, L., Raven, M., Smith, J. P., Gamble, J., & Dahlen, H. G. (2025). Sex, gender identity and women’s health research and equality: An urgent need for clarity of language and accurate data collection. Women and Birth, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101854
Htun, M. (2022). Women’s Equality and the COVID-19 Caregiving Crisis. Perspectives on Politics, 20(2), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721003133
Johnny Ibrahim, & Jonaedi Efendy. (2016). Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris . PT. Bayu Media Publishing.
Johnson, C. (2024). The Politics of Gender Equality: Australian Lessons in an Uncertain World. In Gender and Politics: Vol. Part F3347 (pp. 1–332). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64816-8
Khasbulatova, O. A., & Smirnova, I. N. (2020). Women’s organizations in Russia and abroad: Technologies for the gender equality promoting. Woman in Russian Society, 4, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.21064/WINRS.2020.4.4
Knop, K., Michaels, R., & Riles, A. (2012). From multiculturalism to technique: Feminism, culture, and the conflict of laws style. Stanford Law Review, 64(3), 589–656. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84860166279&partnerID=40&md5=d8c4fcf8e43ed7c46717f6c05c5dc2ed
Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan. (2025, January 18). Pernyataan Sikap Komnas Perempuan Menanggapi Peraturan Gubernur Jakarta No. 2 Tahun 2025 tentang Tata Cara Pemberian Izin Perkawinan dan Perceraian. KOMNAS PEREMPUAN. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/pernyataan-sikap-detail/pernyataan-sikap-komnas-perempuan-menanggapi-peraturan-gubernur-jakarta-no-2-tahun-2025-tentang-tata-cara-pemberian-izin-perkawinan-dan-perceraian
Kurniansyah, R. A. (2025). PembingkaianMedia Dalam Berita Pergub Poligami ASN Pemprov DKI Jakarta(Studi Pada Media Detik.comdan Kompas.com). SENAKOM: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Komunikasi, 2(1), 205–216.
Lahey, K. A. (2010). Women, substantive equality, and fiscal policy: Gender-based analysis of taxes, benefits, and budgets. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 22(1), 27–106. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.22.1.027
Lambert, P. A., & Scribner, D. L. (2023). GENDER PROVISIONS, RIGHTS ADVOCACY, AND POLICY OUTCOMES IN BOTSWANA AND SOUTH AFRICA. In Gender, Constitutions, and Equality: A Global Comparison (pp. 89–124). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003303725-5
Made, P. A. (2000). Globalisation and gender training for the media: Challenges and lessons learned. Gender and Development, 8(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/741923406
Markovits, E. K., & Bickford, S. (2014). Constructing freedom: Institutional pathways to changing the gender division of labor. Perspectives on Politics, 12(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713003721
Merina, B., & Muhaimin, M. (2023). KEARIFAN LOKAL DAN HUKUM ADAT SUKU DANI DI PAPUA. Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia, 3(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.30588/jhcj.v3i1.1507
Morondo Taramundi, D. (2016). Gender machineries vs. feminist movements? Collective political subjectivity in the time of passive revolution. Gender and Education, 28(3), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1169253
Mount, E. A. D. (2014). Well-intended measures: Conceptualizing gender as a social structure in post-conflict policy development. Advances in Gender Research, 18(PARTB), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-21262014000018B006
Mujahidin, M. S. (2023). HERMENEUTIKA NASR HAMID ABU ZAYD DALAM METODE PERKEMBANGAN TAFSIR MODERN. Jurnal Al-Mubarak: Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 8(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-mubarak.v8i1.1791
Munawaroh, H., & Sulistyaningsih, S. (2023). FEMINISM BASED ON THE HEGEMONY OF GENDER FOUND IN THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF GADIS ARIVIA. JournEEL (Journal of English Education and Literature), 5(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.51836/journeel.v5i1.487
Mustofa, A. M. M. (2017). Poligami Dalam Hukum Agama Dan Negara. AL-IMARAH: Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam, 2(01), 47–58. https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/alimarah/article/view/1029
Nas, Z. (2024). Konsep Keadilan Pada Pernikahan Poligami: Analisa Politik Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Tabayyun: Journal of Islamic Law, 1(2), 88–103.
Nasution, B. J. (2014). Kajian Filosofis tentang Konsep Keadilan dari Pemikiran Klasik sampai Pemikiran Modern. Yustisia2, 3(2).
Nasution, E. R., Bima, M. A., Rahayu, R., Hukum, F., Hukum, I., & Asahan, U. (2024). Nuansa Keadilan dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan Sebuah Kajian Filosofis Pancasila. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(4), 16585–16601. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative%0ANuansa
Nossiff, R. (2007). Gendered citizenship: Women, equality, and abortion policy. New Political Science, 29(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393140601170818
Omidakhsh, N., Sprague, A., & Heymann, J. (2020). Dismantling Restrictive Gender Norms: Can Better Designed Paternal Leave Policies Help? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20(1), 382–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12205
Pua, B., Karamoy, D. N., & Setlight, M. M. M. (2022). KEDUDUKAN ASAS MONOGAMI DALAM PENGATURAN HUKUM PERKAWINAN DI INDONESIA. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 9(6), 2373–2403. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/nusantara/article/view/7872
Rahmania, N. F., & Mutimatun, N. (2016). IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH TENTANG PELAKSANAAN PERCERAIAN BAGI PNS PP NO. 10 TAHUN 1983 jo. PP NO. 45 TAHUN 1990 (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Surakarta). Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Ramadhani, I. (2023). Ragam Regulasi Poligami di Negara Muslim Modern. Jurnal Antologi Hukum, 3(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.21154/antologihukum.v3i1.2313
Raudho, M. (2023). POLIGAMI DAN MONOGAMI PRAKTEK DALAM MASYARAKAT MUSLIM HUKUM KELUARGA ISLAM. Justicia Religia, 1(1), 40–48. https://ejurnal.unival-cilegon.ac.id/index.php/jure/article/view/46
Rodríguez-Galvis, L., & a, H. F. G. E.-S. (2023). Measures for the implementation progress of Beijing’s action platform: An analysis of the implementation the departmental development plan with gender perspective in Colombia (2020-2023). Juridicas, 19(2), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.17151/jurid.2022.19.2.2
Sakir. (2017). AKIBAT HUKUM PERCERAIAN BAGI PNS BERDASARKAN PP NOMOR 10 TAHUN 1983 jo PP NOMOR 45 TAHUN 1990. Lex Privatum, 5(5).
Setiawan, B. A., Muhammad Musip, & Muhammad Alvin Saputra. (2023). Telaah Konsep Poligami dalam Islam di Era Kontemporer Perspektif Maslahah Imam Al-Ghozali. Article in Jurnal Tana Mana, 4(2), 107–116. https://ojs.staialfurqan.ac.id/jtm/
Shade, L. R. (2013). Gender and digital policy: From global information infrastructure to internet governance. In The Routledge Companion to Media & Gender (pp. 222–232). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203066911-28
Sugitanata, A., Karimullah, S. S., & Hasan, F. (2024). DINAMIKA DALAM PRAKTIK PERNIKAHAN: TAWARAN UNTUK MENGURANGI PREVALENSI POLIGAMI DI ERA KONTEMPORER. AT-THARIQ: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Budaya, 4(01). https://doi.org/10.57210/trq.v4i01.284
Sukti, S., Warsito, T., Qodir, Z., & Jubba, H. (2023). KEADILAN GENDER: PENDIDIKAN, KEPEMIMPINAN DAN HAK KEWARISAN ISLAM (Studi Analisis Pemikiran Hamka Haq). Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Masyarakat, 18(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v18i2.4166
Suryo Febyanti, D. (2022). Prinsip Keadilan Pada Pembagian Harta Bersama Setelah Berakhirnya Perkawinan. HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2022.v2i1.14-26
Vieru, S. (2010). Aristotle’s Influence on the Natural Law Theory of St Thomas Aquinas. The Western Australian Jurist.
Woodroffe, J. (2015). Twenty Years after Beijing: Can Promises be Turned into Progress? IDS Bulletin, 46(4), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-5436.12162
Wyant, A. (2021). A cross-national examination of food insecurity and gender equality. Sociology of Development, 7(3), 285–313. https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2019.0022
Zayd, N. H. A. (2004). Rethinking the Qur’an: Towards a Humanistic Hermeneutics. Universiteit Voor Humanistiek, 1–63. www.stichtingsocrates.nl/Zayd/SocratesOratie Nasr Abu Zayd.pdf